Legal Opinion

People v. Moran

California Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 2016No. S215914PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WERDEGAR, J.

We granted review in this case to consider the Court of Appeal’s ruling that a probation condition prohibiting defendant Jeffrey Michael Moran from entering the premises or adjacent parking lot of any Home Depot store in California violates his constitutional right to travel. Because we find no such constitutional violation, we reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeal.

I. Facts

Defendant Moran entered a Home Depot store in San Jose, placed items valued at $128 in his backpack, and left the store without paying. Confronted by store security, he admitted the theft and…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Lyng v. Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. People v. LentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. People v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Tobe v. City of Santa AnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. People v. Ricardo P. (In Re Ricardo P.)California Supreme Court · 2019
  2. People v. DeHoyosCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  3. People v. DeLeonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  4. People v. GarciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  5. People v. StapletonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API