Legal Opinion

Gerdin v. Princeton State Bank

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 18, 1985No. CX-85-204PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

Appellant appeals the trial court’s granting of summary judgment in favor of respondents. Appellant claims the trial court erred because genuine issues of material fact existed. We reverse and remand for trial on the merits.

FACTS

Gerdin Transfer, Inc., defaulted on its mortgage held by respondent Princeton State Bank. The bank retained Louis L. Hoffman and John C. Hoffman, attorneys, to initiate mortgage foreclosure proceedings. The Hoffmans were told it would be necessary to extinguish certain tax liens. Appellant Wilford Gerdin saw the notice of foreclosure sale…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Togstad v. Vesely, Otto, Miller & KeefeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. Langeland v. Farmers State Bank of TrimontSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Barron v. MullinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
  4. Arnold v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  5. Carney v. Central Life Assurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Veit v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Gerdin v. Princeton State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Berger v. Nationstar Mortgage LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2015
  4. Gerdin v. Princeton State BankCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API