Barron v. Mullin
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal from an order of the district court for Hice county, Lord, J., presiding, refusing- a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtGilkillan, C. J.
Henry Chaffee, Charles L. Snyder and this defendant were co-partners, and in their copartnership business owned and used real aud personal property. Snyder died, and after his death Chaffee brought suit against this defendant and Margaret Snyder, the widow and administratrix, and Harriet Snyder, the sole heir of the deceased partner, to close up the partnership affairs. By the judgment in that suit, this plaintiff was appointed receiver, and directed to sell all the real and personal property of the firm, and, pursuant to that direction, he offered for sale at auction, and sold, in one…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hanna v. MillsNew York Supreme Court · 1839
- Smith v. ArnoldU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island · 1829
- Rinehart v. OlwineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1843
- Fox v. MenschSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1842
- Bashore v. WhislerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1835
3Cited by20 opinions
- C. Aultman & Co. v. DaggsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1892
- American Manufacturing Co. v. KlarquistSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Kelly v. PierceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
- Wasser v. Western Land Securities Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Jackson v. HolbrookSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.