Legal Opinion

Curtis v. Meadows

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1915PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Raleigh County. Action by Milton Curtis against Thomas Meadows. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Williams, Judge :

Plaintiff brought this action of unlawful entry and detainer to recover possession of a tract of land described in the summons by metes and bounds. The court sustained defendant’s motion to exclude plaintiff’s evidence, directed a verdict for defendant and entered judgment thereon; and plaintiff brings error.

The principal point urged by his counsel in support of the alleged error in excluding his evidence and directing a verdict is, that it was proven by the uncontradieted testimony of plaintiff’s witnesses that defendant, by force and arms, ousted *24him, and that, therefore,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moore v. DouglassWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Duff v. GoodWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Fisher v. HarmanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. DavisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Curtis v. MeadowsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Wiles v. WalkerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Williamson v. Wayland Oil & Gas Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API