Legal Opinion

Curtis v. Meadows

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1919PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Raleigh County. Action of unlawful entry and detainer by Milton Curtis against Thomas Meadows. Verdict and judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Williams, Judge:*

This action of -unlawful entry and detainer' was brought to recover possession of about one hundred acres of land, and was tried in 1914 resulting in a judgment for defendant. On writ of error to this court, the judgment was reversed and a new trial granted because the court had erroneously directed a verdict for the defendant. 77 W. Va, 22. It was again tried and a verdict found in favor of defendant on which the court rendered judgment, and plaintiff is now prosecuting this writ of error to that judgment.

A brief statement of the facts on which the parties rely in support of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Robinson v. BraidenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Winding Gulf Colliery Co. v. CampbellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Matheny v. AllenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. South Penn Oil Co. v. KnoxWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Duff v. GoodWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1884

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Moore v. Johnson Service Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Creasy v. TincherWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. McQueen v. AhbeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Godfrey L. Cabot, Inc. v. Clarksburg Light & Heat Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1926
  5. First Huntington National Bank v. Gideon-Broh Realty Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API