Moore v. Douglas
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Yolo County and from an order denying a new trial. W. H. Grant, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.
— This action is, in a measure, a companion of Wolfskill v. Douglas, ante, p. 397, and much of the testimony taken was used in both actions.
The appeal is from the judgment in favor of the plaintiff, and also from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial. The judgment was rendered July 19, 1895, and the order denying a new trial, July 6, 1899; the notice of appeal was-filed July 17, 1899.
The appeal from the judgment, not having been taken in time, cannot be considered; and the appellant’s contention that the complaint fails to state a cause of action, and that the demurrer to the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Roberts v. EldredCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Hall v. SusskindCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
3Cited by15 opinions
- Simon Newman Co. v. LassingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Jenson v. Will & Finck Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- White v. CostiganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Merced Bank v. PriceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- Toms v. HellmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.