White v. Costigan
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The suit is in equity, to compel the defendant Costigan to convey to plaintiff 640 acres of land situated in Kings County. Plaintiff had judgment, and defendants appeal from an order denying their motion for a new trial. No appeal is taken from the judgment. The action was com menced in Kings County, but was, by stipulation, transferred for trial to the city and county of San Francisco. The complaint sets forth in substance that White, the husband of plaintiff, entered into a contract with the defendants Costigan and the two Cohens, by which said defendants agreed to furnish White…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Truscott v. . KingNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
- Campbell v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
- White v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Reclamation District No. 556 v. ThisbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Viner v. UntrechtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Watson v. PooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Norton v. BassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Taber v. BaileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Wait v. Homestead Building Ass'nWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1918
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.