Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. The Hubbard Company
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 22, 1983No. 81-1674PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
The National Labor Relations Board petitions for enforcement of an order directing the Hubbard Company (Company) to bargain with Toledo Typographical Union No. 63, International Typographical Union, AFL-CIO (Union). The Company opposes enforcement on the grounds that the Union was improperly certified as the employees’ bargaining representative. For the reasons stated below, we deny the Board’s petition for enforcement.
I
In April 1980, a representation election was held among the Company’s production, maintenance and delivery employees at its Defiance, Ohio facility. The record indicates that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Harlan 4 Coal Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- Yoshio Uyeda v. Jerome H. Brooks, Acting Regional Director, Seventh Region, National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
- National Labor Relations Board v. Connecticut Foundry Company, International Ladies' Garment Workers Union, Afl-Cio, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Linn Gear Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Cherrin Corporation v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Action Automotive, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Action Automotive, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- National Labor Relations Board v. Action Automotive, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- National Labor Relations Board v. Action Automotive, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985