Legal Opinion
Yancey Bros. v. Bowling
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided June 24, 1955No. 35702PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCarlisle, J.
1. By a comprehensive act (Ga. L. 1951, pp. 3345-3370), the General Assembly redefined the jurisdiction of, and the practice and procedure in, the Municipal Court of Augusta, and repealed all prior laws dealing with the subject in conflict therewith. By the terms of Paragraph 12 of Part Two, p. 3357, of that act it is provided: “(A) In all cases in said court wherein the principal sum claimed or the value of property in controversy does not exceed fifty dollars ($50.00), whether tried by jury or tried by the judge without a jury, the judgment of said court shall be conclusive, and no new…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ferst's Sons & Co. v. Bank of WaycrossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Chance v. SimpkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
- Acree v. KaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Brown v. HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1856
- Loftis Plumbing & Heating Co. v. American Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Franchise Enterprises, Inc. v. RidgewayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Chewning v. HuebnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- LEASING SYSTEMS, INC. v. Easy Street, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Crow v. CookCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
- Reserve Insurance Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.