Legal Opinion

Ferst's Sons & Co. v. Bank of Waycross

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 11, 1900PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Complaint. Before Judge Bennet. Ware superior court. August 23, 1899.

1Opinion of the CourtSimmons, C. J.

In the petition of M. Ferst’s Sons & Co., against the Bank of Waycross, substantially the following facts are alleged: In November, 1896, Lee.was indebted to plaintiffs in the amount of-$618.09. He was carrying on a railroad wood and cross-tie business, and applied to them for a further line of credit, which they refused. Lee was indebted to the' Bank of Waycross in a large amount, and the bank was interested pecuniarily in Lee’s business, for the reason that Lee had agreed to deposit his gross receipts with- the bank in payment of his debt to it, the bank allowing Lee to draw from it only…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Leonard v. VredenburghNew York Supreme Court · 1811
  2. Emerson v. SlaterSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
  3. Farley v. ClevelandNew York Supreme Court · 1825
  4. Davis v. TiftSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  5. Anderson v. Whitehead, Eggleston & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1875

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Coldwell Co. v. CowartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  2. Palmetto Mfg. Co. v. Parker & AndersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Klag v. Home Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  4. Sawyer v. BahnsenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Williams v. GarrisonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API