Legal Opinion
Lpi Downtown Investors 1 Michael H. Lapidus v. Municipal Court of the County of Los Angeles James K. Hahn
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 4, 1995No. 93-56568UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
51 F.3d 281
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
LPI DOWNTOWN INVESTORS 1; Michael H. Lapidus, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
MUNICIPAL COURT OF the COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; James K.
Hahn, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 93-56568.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 9, 1995.*
Decided April 4, 1995.
IN PART, REVERSED IN PART.
Before: BROWNING, D.W. NELSON and HAWKINS,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Rizzo v. GoodeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Ruth E. Oscar Charles Spinosa v. University Students Co-Operative Association George ProperCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Wedges/ledges of California, Inc. A California Corporation v. City of Phoenix, Arizona, a MunicipalityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- LPI Downtown Investors 1 v. HahnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998