Husted v. Willoughby
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Eaton; Smith, J. Trespass guare clausum fregit by Henry Husted against Samuel Willoughby. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
This is an action of trespass brought in justice’s court for the removal of what was claimed to be the line fence between the lands of the parties. The defendant pleaded the general issue, and gave notice of title. The case was certified to the circuit court by the magistrate, where a trial resulted in a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $13.30. The material part ot the declaration is as follows:
“For that the defendant on, to wit, the 20th day of April, A. D. 1895, with force and arms, the close of the said plaintiff, situate in the township of Hamlin, in said county, and known and described…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Smith v. HamiltonMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
- Stewart v. CarletonMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Joyce v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
- Dupont v. StarringMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Jones v. PashbyMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- F. H. Wolf Brick Co. v. LonyoMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Hastings Industrial Co. v. MoranMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Acosta v. GinglesSupreme Court of Florida · 1915
- Grell v. GanserWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
- Conner v. Detroit Terminal RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.