Jones v. Pashby

This is the third time this ease has appeared in this Court. See Jones v. Pashby, 48 Mich. 634, and 62 Id. 614.

*460A sufficient statement of the matters in controversy will be found in the opinions filed heretofore.

When the case was last here we held that the language of the deeds exchanged between Charles and James Richardson intended a division of the 100 acres by quantity, each taking 50 acres. But we further said:

“There was evidence introduced upon both sides, upon the trial of the case in the court below, tending to show an actual location of the boundary line between James and Charles…