Legal Opinion

State v. Kramer

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 30, 2009No. 07-1202PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKER, Justice.

The State appeals the trial court’s dismissal of this criminal case on double jeopardy grounds. Initially, the court orally granted the defendant’s motion for judgment of acquittal for insufficiency of the evidence, but then immediately reversed this ruling upon being informed that the evidence thought lacking was in the record. Upon the defendant’s objection that this reversal violated the Double Jeopardy Clause, the court dismissed the case. We are asked to decide: (1) whether a court may immediately revise an oral ruling on a motion for judgment of acquittal without…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Illinois v. SomervilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. LymanSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  2. In the Matter of the Guardianship and Conservatorship of Stuart Kennedy (Involuntary) Stuart Kennedy v. Maria KennedySupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  3. State of Iowa v. Christopher Raymond LindellSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  4. State of Iowa v. David Edward BruceSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
  5. Walker v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API