Legal Opinion
Driver v. Naini
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided March 2, 2010No. Docket 280844PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
In this case alleging medical malpractice, defendant Cardiovascular Clinical Associates, EC. (CCA), appeals by leave granted the circuit court’s order denying its motion for summary disposition. We reverse.
The relevant facts are not disputed. Plaintiff 1 has colon cancer, which was diagnosed in November 2005. He had treated with defendant Dr. Mansoor G. Naini before his cancer diagnosis. He claims that Dr. Naini failed to refer him for a colonoscopy.
On April 25, 2006, plaintiffs’ counsel sent a notice of intent to bring their action to Dr. Naini and defendant Michigan Cardiology Associates,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- In Re the Accounting of TottenNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
- Bush v. ShabahangMichigan Supreme Court · 2009
- Waltz v. WyseMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
- Burton v. Reed City Hospital Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2005
- Washington v. Sinai Hosp. of Greater DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Driver v. NainiMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
- Anzaldua v. Neogen Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2011
- Davis v. ChatmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
- McCracken v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
- Lockwood v. Mobile Medical Response, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.