Inez W. Nicholas v. The Mutual Benefit Life Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM E. MILLER, Circuit Judge.
In this diversity action we are required to consider a difficult and somewhat esoteric distinction, frequently articulated by the Tennessee courts, between “accidental means” and “accidental results” policies of insurance.
Plaintiff, Inez W. Nicholas, sued in the court below as the beneficiary of a policy of life insurance issued by defendant on the life of her son, Jerry Thomas Nicholas, to recover additional benefits under the policy if “the death of the insured resulted directly, and independently of all other causes, from accidental bodily injuries * * *.”…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Mutual Life Insurance v. DistrettiTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
- Stone v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1915
- Scott v. Metropolitan Life Ins.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1935
- Seeley v. Pilot Fire & Casualty CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States ex rel. Shannon Martin, M.D. v. Darren HathawayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
- Smith v. Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1994
- Gottfried v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979