Rollin v. Kimberly Clark Tissue Co.
District Court, S.D. Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BUTLER, Chief Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss (Docs. 53 & 54), filed by Troy H. Middleton, III, M.D., Neurosurgery, P.A., and Coastal Neurological Institute, P.A. (collectively, “Dr.Middleton”), the response thereto (Docs. 57 & 58), filed by Kimberly Clark Tissue Co. (“Kimberly Clark”), Dr. Middleton’s subsequent reply (Doc. 60), and Kimberly Clark’s sur-reply (Doc. 62). After careful review of the pleadings, the argu*672ments of the parties, and relevant case law, the Court finds that Dr. Middleton’s motion is due to be GRANTED.
I. Background
This case arises…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- City of Chicago v. International College of SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Marmac, LLC v. ReedDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2005
- In re: M/V AET EXCELLENCE and M/V AET INNOVATORDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2025