Legal Opinion

Blyth v. Marcus

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 14, 1999No. 24954PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Justice:

The trial court granted respondent summary judgment on the grounds that the action was barred by the statute of limitations and the tolling statute was unconstitutional. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

In Columbia, on August 20, 1984, a car driven by respondent, Frank Marcus (Marcus), crossed the center lane and struck appellant, Eileen Blyth (Blyth), who was riding a bicycle. At the time of the accident both parties lived in South Carolina. Marcus moved to Georgia sometime in April 1985 and since then has remained a resident of Georgia.

Blyth commenced this action by filing a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bendix Autolite Corp. v. Midwesco Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Brown v. PearsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
  3. Thatcher v. Tennessee Gas Transmission Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
  4. Pratali v. GatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. Henderson v. EvansSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Laffitte v. Bridgestone Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  2. Adams v. RhoadCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010
  3. Cadles Grassy Meadow v. GoldnerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  4. In Re RabensCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010
  5. Laffitte v. Bridgestone Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API