Camden Community Development Corp. v. Sutton
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1DissentAnnabelle Clinton Imber, Justice
We are ustice, rezoning is a legislative function that may be the subject of an initiative petition under Amendment 7 to the Arkansas Constitution. Our decision on that question does not depend upon a city councd’s action or inaction on a particular zoning ordinance. Rather, our decision is governed by whether the city councd has the legislative authority to enact rezoning ordinances. If that legislative authority has been delegated to a city council by the General Assembly, then rezoning may be the subject of an initiative petition under Amendment 7.
The General Assembly has given to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Leigh v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
- City of Lowell v. M & N Mobile Home Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Wenderoth v. City of Fort SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
- Scroggins v. KerrSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
- Taggart & Taggart Seed Company, Inc. v. City of AugustaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.