Legal Opinion
Eduard Von Der Heydt v. Rober F. Kennedy, Attorney General of the United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided February 20, 1962No. 16365_1PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BASTIAN, Circuit Judge.
This is the second time this case has been before this court. Our previous opinion is reported in Von Der Heydt v. Rogers, 102 U.S.App.D.C. 114, 251 F.2d 17 (1958).
Appellant von der Heydt, a Swiss citizen, and two corporations solely owned by him [all hereinafter designated as plaintiff or appellant], sued to recover property which had been seized in 1951 by the United States under the Trading with the Enemy Act, 40 Stat. 411 (1917), 50 U.S.C.A.App. §§ 1-39. Appellees defended the seizure on the ground that appellant was enemy-tainted. On the Government’s motion, the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Von Der Heydt v. RogersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
- Boomhower, Inc. v. BoomhowerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
- Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales S.A. v. Herbert Brownell, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
3Cited by16 opinions
- Compagnie Francaise d'Assurance Pour le Commerce Exterieur v. Phillips Petroleum Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Robert P. Smith v. James R. Schlesinger, Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Cozine v. Hawaiian Catamaran, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1966
- Washington Mobilization Committee v. Burtell M. Jefferson, Chief of the Metropolitan Police Department of the District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Von Brimer v. Whirlpool CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1973
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.