Legal Opinion

Von Der Heydt v. Rogers

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 2, 1958No. 13855PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

The District Court granted appellee’s motion to dismiss appellant’s complaint for failure to produce documents and records for which an order to produce had been made. Before ruling on the motion, the District Court heard testimony for nine days and received numerous exhibits, all presumably bearing on the issues of materiality of the records sought, the possession and control of these records by appellant, appellant’s actions constituting refusal to produce, and so forth. The District Court made no findings other than its order of dismissal which it characterized as containing findings.…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,803 Steven Flaks v. David I. Koegel and Flora Mir Candy CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  2. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Howard R. Hughes, and Hughes Tool Company and Raymond M. HollidayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
  3. Sharon Bonds v. District of Columbia and Director, District of Columbia Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  4. Weisberg v. WebsterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  5. United States v. Christopher WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API