Legal Opinion

In re the Application for Letters of Administration of the Goods, Chattels & Credits of Hafner

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided January 15, 1924Published

1Opinion of the Court

Schulz, S.

The uncontradicted evidence in this matter is that the marriage relation existed between the decedent and Harriet Hafner, the petitioner, and that it began in or about the year 1896, and I so hold. It follows that the issue of such marriage is legitimate.

It also appears, without contradiction, that the decedent and his wife Harriet had separated and were living apart prior to the former’s death, and that in the year 1914 a ceremonial marriage was contracted by the decedent with one Sadie Hafner who, so far *278as the evidence discloses, had no knowledge whatsoever of the prior marriage…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hunter v. HunterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. In the Matter of Opening Eleventh AvenueNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  3. In re TompkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
  4. Price v. TompkinsNew York Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Fagin v. FaginNew York Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API