Legal Opinion
Price v. Tompkins
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 15, 1919PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Motion to amend complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtSawyer, J.
Plaintiffs’ motion to amend the complaint by adding immediately after the phrase “ and that during such cohabitation, and until his death, the said Charles D. Price was ignorant of the marriage of the said Harriet E. Hilton and that his said marriage to her was illegal and void,” the paragraph, ‘‘ That in or about the year 1867, the said Harriet E. Hilton saw the said H. Seymour Hilton in the city of New York, N. Y., and ever thereafter withheld and concealed such fact from the said Charles D. Price,” is granted with the usual exception to defendants. Order to that effect may be entered.
The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hynes v. . McDermottNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Fenton v. ReedNew York Supreme Court · 1809
- Fisk v. FiskAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Barker v. BarkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- di Lorenzo v. di LorenzoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hess v. PettigrewMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Masocco v. SchaafAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
- Claim of Esmond v. Thomas Lyons Bar & GrillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
- In re TompkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
- McCarter v. McCarterNew York Supreme Court · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.