Legal Opinion

Missouri Commission on Human Rights v. City of Sikeston/Sikeston Power Plant/Board of Municipal Utilities

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 21, 1989No. 15790PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLANIGAN, Presiding Judge.

On February 2, 1982, Willie J. Sykes, who is black, filed a complaint with the Missouri Commission on Human Rights, (the Commission), alleging that the City of Sikeston, by whom he was employed until that date, was guilty of an unlawful employment practice. In essence his complaint was that the City, through its agents, racially discriminated against him with respect to terms and conditions of his employment at the City’s power plant.

Section 296.020 RSMo 1978, 1 on which the complaint was based, read, in pertinent part:

“1. It shall be an unlawful employment practice:…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Furnco Construction Corp. v. WatersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & TrustSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Carolyn LIDGE-MYRTIL, Appellant, v. DEERE & COMPANY, Doing Business as John Deere Company, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  2. Margaret Gill v. Reorganized School District R-6, Festus, MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  3. Lane v. Ground Round, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1991
  4. Gamber v. Missouri Department of Health & Senior ServicesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Finley v. Empiregas, Inc. of PotosiCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API