Legal Opinion
Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Independent Wireless Telegraph Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 3, 1924PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DEARNED HAND, District Judge.
Since this motion was argued, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia has awarded De Forest priority over Armstrong upon certain claims in interference proceedings. This does not affect the disposition of the motion. If, as the Court of Appeals said, the invention awarded De Forest is so different from that at bar that both may stand, obviously I may ignore that decision. If, on the other hand, the inventions are so closely akin that their dates of discovery must be identical, as would seem to be the case, still the award of priority to Armstrong m the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Edison Electric Light Co. v. Peninsular Light, Power & Heat Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1900
- General Electric Co. v. Continental Lamp Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
3Cited by8 opinions
- Trico Products Corporation v. Delman CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1961
- Bourjois, Inc. v. Park Drug Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
- Art Metal Works, Inc. v. Cunningham Products Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1930
- In re RuaneDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1929
- Radio Corp. of America v. Radio Engineering Laboratories, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.