Legal Opinion

Art Metal Works, Inc. v. Cunningham Products Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1930PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kresel,

Referee. For about thirty years the plaintiff, Art Metal Works, Inc., and its predecessors have been in the business of manufacturing and selling metal novelties and metal ware. The *430business has been on a very extensive scale, comprising the manufacture and sale of thousands of different kinds of articles. The gross annual sales have been about $5,000,000 a year.

The defendant Cunningham Products Corporation was organized in 1927. It succeeded to the business of the defendant Irving Florman, who conducted that business individually and under the trade name of Irving Florman Company for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Taendsticksfabriks Akticbolagat Vulcan v. MyersNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Yale & Towne Mfg. Co. v. AlderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
  3. Wesson v. GalefDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1922
  4. Moline Plow Co. v. Omaha Iron Store Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
  5. Champion Spark Plug Co. v. A. R. Mosler & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mershon Co. v. PachmayrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. S. J. Charia & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API