Legal Opinion

Johnson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided April 12, 1990No. 8 Div. 219PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON RETURN TO REMAND BOWEN, Judge.

On original submission, the appellant argued that the trial court erred in denying his request to review, for purposes of cross-examination, a report prepared by Investigator Payne. This court found that the procedures followed in the trial court did not fully comply with the requirements of Ex parte Pate, 415 So.2d 1140 (Ala. 1981), and Cooks v. State, 50 Ala.App. 49, 276 So.2d 634, cert, denied, 290 Ala. 363, 276 So.2d 640 (1973), which set out the procedure to be followed by the trial court in determining whether defense counsel is entitled to examine a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1989
  2. Ex Parte WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Cooks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1973
  4. Ex Parte PateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  5. Showers v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. DeFries v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  2. Hagood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1998
  3. Ex Parte JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  4. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2008
  5. Frazier v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API