Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Williams

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 28, 1989No. 87-1130PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 In the Court of Criminal Appeals the defendant's case was styled "Joseph William a/k/a Joseph Williams v. State."

Joseph Williams was convicted of selling a "controlled substance" as defined by Code of Alabama 1975, § 20-2-25, and prohibited by § 20-2-70. The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the conviction in Williams v. State, 548 So.2d 516 (Ala.Cr.App. 1988). This Court issued the writ of certiorari to review the following issues:

1) Whether the controlled substance in this case was unlawfully admitted into evidence because of a missing link in the chain of custody and a failure by the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YarberSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  2. Biddie v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  3. Slaughter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1981
  4. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  5. Ex Parte YarberSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HoltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Arthur v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996
  3. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  4. Slaton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1995
  5. Loggins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1999

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API