Legal Opinion

Marcin v. Darling Valve & Manufacturing Co.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 7, 1966No. Civ. A. No. 65-760PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROSENBERG, District Judge.

This is here on cross motions for summary judgment filed by the plaintiff and the defendant under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on the grounds that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and each claims that he is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

This action was brought by Bernard F. Marcin against the defendant, Darling Valve and Manufacturing Company, for payment of commissions which the plaintiff claims inured to him as the result of services rendered to the defendant as a commission salesman under a contract of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. Consolidated Fisheries Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
  2. Alcoa Steamship Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Pritchard v. WickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. Philadelphia v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Warren M. Wilson v. Homestead Valve Manufacturing Company. Appeal of Warren M. Wilson. Appeal of Homestead Valve Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Vector Engineering & Manufacturing Corp. v. PequetIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Sendi v. NCR Comten, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Fleck v. Durawood Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Slusher v. Mid-America Broadcasting, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. In Re Industrial Car Manufacturing Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API