Gilstrap v. International Contractors Inc.
Alaska Supreme Court
1DissentBurke, Justice
I respectfully dissent from the court’s decision to reverse and remand this case for further proceedings. In order to resolve the valuation issue, I believe this court must first determine which party carried the burden of proving the value of the meals provided at Hidden Falls — Gilstrap or his employer. In Brunke v. Rogers & Babler, 714 P.2d 795, 801 (Alaska 1986), we held that “it was not an unreasonable or unfair burden” to require the employee to produce evidence of post-injury earnings. We noted that the employee is generally in the best position to produce this information. Id.
In this…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hartland v. HartlandAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
- Interior Paint Company v. RodgersAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Miles v. MilesAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
- Wickwire v. City & Borough of JuneauAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Wien Air Alaska v. KramerAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.