Legal Opinion

Wien Air Alaska v. Kramer

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1991No. S-3221PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BURKE, Justice.

We granted review in this case to determine whether a workers’ compensation claimant, Daniel Kramer, can rely on the statutory presumption of compensability, AS 23.30.120(a)(1), to establish, absent substantial evidence to the contrary, that a work-related injury resulted in a compensa-ble disability. In addition, we consider whether the trial court properly raised, sua sponte, the issue of Kramer’s status as an “independent contractor” under the last injurious exposure rule. Finally, we examine whether the superior court abused its discretion by ordering Kramer’s…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Thornton v. Alaska Workmen's Compensation BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Burgess Construction Co. v. SmallwoodAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Veco, Inc. v. WolferAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  4. In re L.A.M.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Delaney v. Alaska AirlinesAlaska Supreme Court · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Adamson v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. DeShongAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Grove v. Alaska Construction & ErectorsAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Olson v. AIC/Martin J.V.Alaska Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Sokolowski v. Best Western Golden Lion HotelAlaska Supreme Court · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API