Wien Air Alaska v. Kramer
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BURKE, Justice.
We granted review in this case to determine whether a workers’ compensation claimant, Daniel Kramer, can rely on the statutory presumption of compensability, AS 23.30.120(a)(1), to establish, absent substantial evidence to the contrary, that a work-related injury resulted in a compensa-ble disability. In addition, we consider whether the trial court properly raised, sua sponte, the issue of Kramer’s status as an “independent contractor” under the last injurious exposure rule. Finally, we examine whether the superior court abused its discretion by ordering Kramer’s…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Thornton v. Alaska Workmen's Compensation BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
- Burgess Construction Co. v. SmallwoodAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Veco, Inc. v. WolferAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
- In re L.A.M.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986
- Delaney v. Alaska AirlinesAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Adamson v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. DeShongAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
- Grove v. Alaska Construction & ErectorsAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
- Olson v. AIC/Martin J.V.Alaska Supreme Court · 1991
- Sokolowski v. Best Western Golden Lion HotelAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.