Baron Tube Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Rao, Judge:
The merchandise to which the instant protests relate consists of electrically welded steel tubes, imported in lengths of 155 *86inches or of 20 feet, ranging in diameters from % to 1% inches, with wall thicknesses of either 16 or 18 gauge. This merchandise was classified by the collector of customs at the port of entry as steel tubes, within the provisions of paragraph 328 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 82 Treas. Dec. 305, T. D. 51802, or by the Annecy Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 84 Treas. Dec. 403, T.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. FrankCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
- United States v. Henry L. Exstein Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- Western Elec. Co., Inc. v. ColleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Most v. Goebel Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1918
- Winkler-Koch Engineering Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
3Cited by3 opinions
- T. D. Downing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
- Baron Tube Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
- John A. Steer Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966