Legal Opinion

Baron Tube Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 24, 1958No. C.D. 2059PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rao, Judge:

On August 22, 1957, a decision and judgment were rendered herein, Lawrence, J., dissenting in part (39 Cust. Ct. 85, C. D. 1910), holding certain imported steel tubes to be dutiable at the rate of 7)4 per centum ad valorem, within the provisions of paragraph 312 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 86 Treas. Dec. 121, T. D. 52739, for all other structural shapes of iron or steel, advanced beyond hammering, rolling, or casting, as alternatively claimed by plaintiffs.

Both parties thereupon moved for a rehearing…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. FrankCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  2. United States v. Henry L. Exstein Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  3. Baron Tube Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. American Mannex Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  2. John A. Steer Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API