T. D. Downing Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
FoRD, Judge:
The subjeot importations, described as a turret punch press and parts, were classified as “Punches * * * intended for use in fabricating structural or other rolled iron or steel shapes” under paragraph 372 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Sixth Protocol of Supplementary Concessions to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T.D. 54108, and were assessed with duty at the rate of 17 per centum ad valorem. Plaintiff claims the importations are properly dutiable as “machine tools,” at the rate of 15 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 372, as modified by the General…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Henry L. Exstein Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- United States v. Merck & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
- Atchison, T. & S. F. R. v. Union Wire Rope Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1931
- Baron Tube Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
- National Lock Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- House of Lloyd, Inc. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
- Commercial Shearing & Stamping Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
- Gehrig, Hoban & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- T. D. Downing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- Western Wire Works, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971