Legal Opinion

Shannon v. Mereness

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 26, 1915PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Application of the plaintiff and appellant to this court, for an order requiring the trial judge (Burpee, J.) to make and file a finding of facts.

1Per curiam

The above-entitled case was tried upon issues of fact to the court in the Superior Court in Fairfield county, and judgment therein rendered in favor of the defendant. The plaintiff thereupon, in due course and form, requested the trial judge to make and file a finding of facts for the purposes of appeal. The request stated that it was desired to have six questions of law reviewed. Two of these questions were, in effect, the general one whether there was error in the rendition of the judgment; the other four whether the court did not err in making certain recited rulings. The judge denied the…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Crighton v. JacobsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
  2. Dime Savings Bank of Hartford v. BragawSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  3. Hoyt v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  4. Bransfield v. Goodrich Tire Co.Connecticut Superior Court · 1962
  5. Bransfield v. Goodrich Tire Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API