Legal Opinion
Stambler v. Dillon
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 23, 1969No. 68 Civ. 537PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HERLANDS, District Judge:
The amended complaint in the instant action alleges that the defendants acted and conspired in such a way as to violate various civil rights statutes, inter alia, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1982, 1983, 1985, 1986, 1994, and the Fifth, Sixth, Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. Plaintiffs assert that jurisdiction arises under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1332 and 1343; and declaratory relief is sought under 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202.
Answers by all the defendants except Justice Dillon assert the defenses of lack of subject matter jurisdiction,…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. ClassicSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Howard Smith Bennett v. Albert Passic, Sheriff, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
- Robert E. Sykes v. State of California (Department of Motor Vehicles)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Brawer v. HorowitzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Claude Grow v. Thomas G. Fisher, Individually and in His Capacity as Prosecuting Attorney for the 30th Judicial Circuit of the State of IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- Philip D. Myers v. Clyde Harold BullCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.