Legal Opinion

St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. McCormick & Baxter Creosoting Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 9, 1994No. A8711-07096; CA A71072PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Plaintiffs and cross-defendants St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company, Inc., and St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company, Inc. (St. Paul), brought this declaratory judgment action against their insured McCormick & Baxter (M & B). St. Paul sought a declaration that there is no coverage under St Paul’s liability insurance contracts for costs incurred by M & B in investigating and correcting environmental contamination resulting from its operations in Oregon and California. St. Paul included as defendants the insurance companies that had issued liability insurance contracts to M & B, seeking a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Hoffman Construction Co. of Alaska v. Fred S. James & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Caldwell v. Travelers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1924
  4. Lilienthal v. KaufmanOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  5. SCHOOL DIST. NO. 1, ETC. v. Mission Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. McCormick & Baxter Creosoting Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Ala. Plating v. US Fidelity and Guar.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  3. Anderson Brothers, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire and Marine InsurCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  4. Certain Underwriters v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  5. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co. v. Archdiocese of PortlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API