Legal Opinion

Scott v. Garfield

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 15, 2009PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtIreland, J.

We transferred this case from the Appeals Court to consider whether a lawful visitor may recover damages for personal injuries caused by a breach of the implied warranty of habitability. Charles M. Scott (Scott) suffered injuries while visiting an apartment leased by his friend from the defendants, Stuart and Ellen Garfield, when a railing on a second-floor porch gave way and he fell to the ground. Judgment entered for Scott on his claim of breach of the implied warranty of habitability, and the defendants appealed. Because we conclude that a lawful visitor may recover damages for personal…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Mounsey v. EllardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  2. Boston Housing Authority v. HemingwayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  3. Corsetti v. Stone Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  4. Correia v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  5. Wiedmann v. Bradford Group, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Swanson v. BrewsterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  2. Jean Dedmon v. Debbie SteelmanTennessee Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Martinez v. MILBURN ENTERPRISES, INC.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  4. Law v. GriffithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  5. Commonwealth v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API