Legal Opinion

Mandjik v. Eden Township Hospital District

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 31, 1992No. A051360PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BENSON, J.

Plaintiffs Siegrid and Stefan Mandjik, a married couple, appeal from the trial court’s order and judgment of dismissal, which was entered after the trial court sustained the general demurrer of defendant Eden Township Hospital District without leave to amend. We reverse.

I. Factual and Procedural Background

This is an action for medical malpractice arising out of Siegrid Mandjik’s hospitalization at defendant’s hospital from July 2, 1987, through August 20, 1987. Plaintiffs allege that on July 22, 1987, as a direct and proximate result of defendant’s negligence, Siegrid Mandjik…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Gutierrez v. MofidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Whitfield v. RothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Phillips v. Desert Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Santee v. Santa Clara County Office of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Industry v. City of FillmoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. Paniagua v. ORANGE COUNTY FIRE AUTHORITYCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. DeVore v. Department of the California Highway PatrolCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. Estill v. Cnty. of Shasta, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. Andrews v. Metropolitan Transit SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API