Mandjik v. Eden Township Hospital District
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BENSON, J.
Plaintiffs Siegrid and Stefan Mandjik, a married couple, appeal from the trial court’s order and judgment of dismissal, which was entered after the trial court sustained the general demurrer of defendant Eden Township Hospital District without leave to amend. We reverse.
I. Factual and Procedural Background
This is an action for medical malpractice arising out of Siegrid Mandjik’s hospitalization at defendant’s hospital from July 2, 1987, through August 20, 1987. Plaintiffs allege that on July 22, 1987, as a direct and proximate result of defendant’s negligence, Siegrid Mandjik…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Gutierrez v. MofidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Whitfield v. RothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Phillips v. Desert Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Santee v. Santa Clara County Office of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- City of Industry v. City of FillmoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Paniagua v. ORANGE COUNTY FIRE AUTHORITYCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- DeVore v. Department of the California Highway PatrolCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Estill v. Cnty. of Shasta, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Andrews v. Metropolitan Transit SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.