Legal Opinion

Metro Machine Corp. v. Berkley Shipbuilding & Drydock Corp. (In re Ward)

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided August 16, 1983No. Bankruptcy No. 81-01711-N; Adv. No. 82-0285-APublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

MARTIN V.B. BOSTETTER, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge.

Ashton H. Pully, Jr. (“Pully”), a Virginia Beach attorney, sought a ruling of this Court permitting late filing of a proof of claim in the above-styled bankruptcy case. The basis of Pully’s claim is an alleged statutory lien for attorney fees pursuant to *320section 54-70 of the Code of Virginia 1 At a hearing held April 12, 1983, the Court ruled that it could find no cause to permit late filing of the proof of claim absent a finding that Pully holds a valid lien under the provisions of the Virginia Code.

The debtor, William Lawrence…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Meyer v. FlemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Heinzman v. Fine, Fine, Legum & FineSupreme Court of Virginia · 1977
  3. Katopodis v. Liberian S/T Olympic SunDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1968
  4. Bolling v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
  5. Fary v. AquinoSupreme Court of Virginia · 1978

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re AlbertUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1997
  2. In Re AshleyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1984
  3. In Re SmithUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2008
  4. Military Circle Pet Center 94, Inc. v. Docktor Pet Holdings, Ltd. (In Re Military Circle Pet Center 94, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1994
  5. Mains v. HargettFairfax County Circuit Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API