Legal Opinion
US Philips Corp. v. Iwasaki Elec. Co. Ltd.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided November 2, 2007No. 2007-1117PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LINN, Circuit Judge.
U.S. Philips Corporation appeals from a final judgment entered pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 54(b) in favor of Iwasaki Electric Company Ltd. by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Specifically, U.S. Philips challenges the district court’s decision to limit U.S. Philips’s right of recovery to acts of infringement after the complaint was filed, based on a failure of notice; its claim construction ruling relating to U.S. Patent No. 5,109,181 (“the '181 patent”); and its decision to grant partial summary judgment of noninfringement as to those…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Smithkline Beecham Corp. v. Apotex [Corrected Date]Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Cohesive Technologies, Inc. v. Waters Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Adams Respiratory Therapeutics, Inc. v. Perrigo Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Pozen Inc. v. Par Pharmaceutical, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Cadence Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Exela Pharma Sciences LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.