Legal Opinion
City of Englewood v. Wagoner
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided November 19, 1987No. CA 10239PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWolff, J.
This is an eminent domain case. The city of Englewood (hereinafter “city”) appeals the jury award of compensation to Carl and Hazel Wagoner. We affirm for the reasons that follow.
The Wagoners own property on the east side of Union Road in the city of Englewood. The property consisted of a 2.3-acre tract with three major structures, to wit: a brick single-family residence, a frame barn, and a frame commercial building. It is only this commercial building, a shoe store that fronts on Union Road, that is the focus of this proceeding.
The city needed an additional right-of-way in order to expand…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cincinnati Riverfront Coliseum, Inc. v. McNulty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
- City of Baldwin Park v. StoskusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- City of Norwood v. Forest Converting Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1984
- C.D.S., Inc. v. Village of Gates MillsOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Shady Acres Nursing Home, Inc. v. CanaryOhio Court of Appeals · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fischer v. Dairy Mart Convenience Stores, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1991
- Wray v. StvartakOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
- MacDonald v. Authentic Invests., L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
- Proctor v. NJR Properties, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Wray v. FitchOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.