Legal Opinion

Travelers Insurance Co. v. Baker

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided August 5, 1932PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The motion to strike the bill of complaint is denied for the reasons stated in my opinion filed in The Prudential InsuranceCompany of America v. Merritt-Chapman Scott Corp., 111 N.J. Eq. 166.

There is, in the instant case, one additional ground urged for striking the bill — that it is premature and in violation of section 65 of the Orphans Court act (3 Comp. Stat. p. 3832), which provides that no action either at law or in equity, except for funeral expenses, shall be brought or maintained against executors or administrators of the estate of any decedent within six months from the time letters…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Prudential Ins. Co. v. Merritt-ChapmanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
  2. Jaburg v. KirschenbaumNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1919
  3. United Security Life Insurance & Trust Co. v. Administrator of VandegriftNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1893
  4. Ayres v. ShepherdNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1902

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Niemaseck v. Bernett Holding Co., Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API