Legal Opinion

Jaburg v. Kirschenbaum

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided May 16, 1919PublishedCited by 6 opinions

On bill, &e.

1Opinion of the Court

Lane, V. C.

The bill alleges that on January 13th, 1919, Joseph Kirschenbaum was indebted to complainants in a certain srnn for goods *511sold by them to him; on January 13th he sold a stock of merchandise and fixtures in bulk to Benjamin Newman; the proceedings were wholly in violation of the provisions of chapter 208 of the laws of 1915 (P. L. 1915 p. 377); Newman entered into possession of the property, and still is in possession; on February 5th Joseph, Kirschenbaum died intestate, and on March 5th Fannie Kirschenbaum applied for and was duly granted letters of administration upon his estate;…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Arnesto Paint Co. v. BrushNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
  2. Axt v. 61 Lincoln ParkNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931
  3. Federal Reserve Bank of Phila. v. WelchNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937
  4. Levitsky v. WirzesNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931
  5. State of Ohio v. ClarkeNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API