Legal Opinion

Warfield v. Krueger

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 8, 1929No. Docket No. 6534PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTyler, P. J.

Action for damages for assault, malicious prosecution, and false imprisonment. Plaintiff appears in propria persona. By a third amended complaint he charged, under various counts, that defendant, a police officer, arrested him on several occasions, and that said arrests were made maliciously and without probable cause. He also alleged that at the time of making one of the arrests, defendant struck him. on the arm. Actual and exemplary damages were prayed for. Defendant denied all the allegations of the complaint. It appeared at the trial, which was had by jury, that plaintiff was in the habit…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Davis v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Chavez v. Times-Mirror Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Clark v. McClurgCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Jacob v. MinerArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Sasser v. Miles & Sons Trucking ServiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API