Legal Opinion

CHS Inc. v. Riemers

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 2018No. 20170331PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tufte, Justice.

[¶ 1] Roland Riemers appeals from a district court judgment awarding CHS Inc. attorney's fees and costs, and from an order denying Riemers' motion to reopen the case and close judgment. Riemers also moves for vacation of the district court's "Corrected Amended Judgment." Because the district court did not abuse its discretion by awarding CHS attorney's fees and costs on the basis of a frivolous motion, we affirm the district court judgment. However, because the order denying Riemers' motion to reopen the case and close judgment reflects that the amount owing to CHS is $679.08,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Federal Land Bank of Saint Paul v. ZiebarthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. First National Bank of Belfield v. BurichNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Strand v. Cass CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Roise v. KurtzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Deacon's Development, LLP v. LambNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Larson v. TonnesonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  2. DCI Credit Services v. PlemperNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Quamme v. QuammeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  4. CHS Inc. v. RiemersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Interest of K.S.D.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API