Legal Opinion

State v. Irby

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 4, 2012No. A11-1852PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SCHELLHAS, Judge.

Appellant challenges his convictions for first- and second-degree assault, first-degree burglary, and prohibited possession of a firearm, arguing that (1) the district court judge who presided over his trial was not a de jure or a de facto judge; (2) the district court abused its discretion by admitting evidence of two prior felony convictions to impeach appellant; and (3) the district court violated appellant’s constitutional right to a public trial by locking the courtroom doors when giving it final jury instructions. We affirm.

FACTS

On September 9, 2009, appellant…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. State v. SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  3. State v. BettinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. State v. McArthurSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  5. Burt v. Winona & St. Peter RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State of Minnesota v. Jaimiah Lamar IrbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  2. State v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
  3. State of Minnesota v. Bashir Abdullahi FarahCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
  4. State of Minnesota v. Jaimiah Lamar IrbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  5. State of Minnesota v. Kemen Lavatos Taylor, IISupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API