State v. Irby
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHELLHAS, Judge.
Appellant challenges his convictions for first- and second-degree assault, first-degree burglary, and prohibited possession of a firearm, arguing that (1) the district court judge who presided over his trial was not a de jure or a de facto judge; (2) the district court abused its discretion by admitting evidence of two prior felony convictions to impeach appellant; and (3) the district court violated appellant’s constitutional right to a public trial by locking the courtroom doors when giving it final jury instructions. We affirm.
FACTS
On September 9, 2009, appellant…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- State v. SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. BettinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. McArthurSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Burt v. Winona & St. Peter RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State of Minnesota v. Jaimiah Lamar IrbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- State v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- State of Minnesota v. Bashir Abdullahi FarahCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- State of Minnesota v. Jaimiah Lamar IrbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- State of Minnesota v. Kemen Lavatos Taylor, IISupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.