Legal Opinion
In Re Chaus
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 2, 1928No. Docket No. 1646PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.
The petitioner herein asks by habeas corpus to obtain his release from confinement in the city jail of the city of Los Angeles after sentence by the municipal court upon conviction of a violation of the Wright Act (Stats. 1921, p. 79).
It appears from the record before us that on or about May 23, 1927, petitioner drove an automobile to a point in the vicinity of Tenth Street and Western Avenue, in the city -of Los Angeles, where he received and placed in the machine five gallons of grain alcohol; that he then drove to a cafe or lunch-wagon on Tenth Street, where one Carl W. Bell, alias Jack…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Gavieres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Burton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Albrecht v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Morgan v. DevineSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Massey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1922
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In Re BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- People v. KrupaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- People v. ClemettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Wilde v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- In Re ConnollyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.