Legal Opinion

Raser Tech. v. Morgan Stanley

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 13, 2019No. Case No. 20170325PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This opinion is subject to revision before final publication in the Pacific Reporter

2019 UT 44

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH RASER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., by and through HOUSTON PHOENIX GROUP, LLC as its Attorney in Fact, 1 Appellants, v. MORGAN STANLEY & COMPANY, LLC, 2 Appellees. No. 20170325 Filed August 13, 2019 On Direct Appeal Third District, Salt Lake The Honorable Judge Todd M. Shaughnessy No. 150906718 Attorneys: Karra J. Porter, Kristen C. Kiburtz, Paul T. Moxley, Patrick E. Johnson, Salt Lake City, Alan M. Pollack, New York, NY, James W. Christian, Houston, TX, for…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  4. Walden v. FioreSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  5. Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Raser Technologies v. Merrill LynchCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2022
  2. Raser Technologies v. Merrill LynchCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2022
  3. Advice Media, LLC dba My Advice v. Gopher Media LLC dba Doctor Multimedia, Connor Morris and Drew NguyenDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2026
  4. Keaty v. DodsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
  5. Nelson v. PhillipsUtah Supreme Court · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API