Kljun v. McCloud (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court
1DissentFrench, J.
*204{¶ 3} I respectfully dissent from the dismissal of this appeal as improvidently accepted, and I would reverse the judgment of the Eighth District Court of Appeals. The Eighth District's decision erroneously broadens the law-of-the-case doctrine. In doing so, it dictates how the Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation ("BWC") must pay certain partial-disability-compensation benefits, even though neither the trial court nor the court of appeals has addressed any statutory basis for that dictate. The issues presented here implicate matters of public and great general interest that justify this…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Nolan v. NolanOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Stevens v. AckmanOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- Gohman v. City of St. BernardOhio Supreme Court · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. RamunasOhio Supreme Court · 2022
- Kljun v. McCloud (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019